Israel's blockade of Gaza: Indefinitely caging Palestinians in a state of non-life
7 min read
In 1995, the eagerly interviewed Palestinians in Gaza to highlight the freedoms the Oslo peace accords had brought them.
Instead of an optimistic feeling of joy and progress, "prison" was a common word Palestinians used to describe their confinement in the small densely populated enclave and inability to move to - or even visit - the occupied West Bank.
±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās closure of Gaza has been incrementally developed since at least the early 1990s. While Israel was making peace with the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) with one hand, in 1993 it was building a separation barrier around Gaza with the other.
Even when the White House had pressured Israel to open a between Gaza and the West Bank and a Palestinian airport in Gaza in 1998-1999, the Israeli government closed both down about a year later at the earliest possibility.
Years of fluctuating restrictions and closures led a prominent Israeli sociologist Baruch Kimmerling to conclude in 2003 that āthe worldās largest concentration camp everā.
"Israel's closure of Gaza has been incrementally developed since at least the early 1990s. While Israel was making peace with the PLO with one hand, it was building a separation barrier around Gaza with the other"
Apartheid in action: A blockade before Hamas
When former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharonās unilateral ādisengagement planā came up in 2004, its stated goal rather than security.
Sharonās Deputy, Ehud Olmert, bluntly to the conflict and occupation is unlikely, which means Palestinians might eventually move towards āa struggle for one-man-one-vote,ā and that would be āa much cleaner struggle, a much more popular struggle ā and ultimately a much more powerful oneā.
Hence, Olmert emphasised the need for addressing āthe demographic issue with the utmost seriousness and resolveā by unilaterally cutting Gaza off from the equation.
Furthermore, Sharonās top aide that the Gaza disengagement primarily aimed to āfreeze the peace processā and prevent āthe establishment of a Palestinian stateā. This made it necessary for Israel to isolate about half the occupied Palestinian population to prevent a one-state solution where Jews become a minority, and locking Gazans up in a cageĢżbecame the solution.
In fact, the policyās original name was the āSeparation Planā, but Sharon had to because āseparation sounded bad, particularly in English, because it evoked apartheidā. Olmert also made clear that the disengagement to strike Gazaās population even harder.
Indeed, Israel retained over Gazaās air, water, and ground spaces as well as telecommunications, electricity and the entry and exit of indispensable goods after the āwithdrawalā.
Instead of opening Gaza to the world and making it into āSingaporeā, ±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās disengagement plan deliberately and openly sought to isolate the enclave, including cutting Gazaās labour force from Israel and denying Gazans access to the West Bank.
This exacerbated an economic recession from ±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās previous years-long restrictions that Ģżāamong the worst in modern historyā.
 |
The blockade: Putting Gaza on a diet, indefinitely
±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās blockade on Gaza is remembered to be a result of Hamas seizing power from the Palestinian Authority (PA) in June 2007. However, the ongoing closure of Gaza started more than a year before and the siege was officially announced three months after Hamas' takeover. The naval blockade .
±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās preceding decade-long isolation and restrictions on Gaza, culminating with a destructive ādisengagementā, dramatically rendered the PA dysfunctional and created a dire humanitarian situation.
This in turn helped Hamas significantly in the 2006 parliamentary elections, an outcome Israel immediately used to further besiege Gaza. āThere is no question that the disengagement from Gaza strengthened the Hamas and weakened [the PA]ā , Moshe Yaāalon, in 2006.
"Palestinians are stuck in a permanent state of non-life, or as Gazans call it 'slow death'"
Following Hamasā win, then PM Olmert closed Gazaās commercial crossing, Karni, and imposed a series of sanctions on the PA including withholding its tax revenues, the PA āa terrorist authorityā.
His top aide, Dov Weisglass, then āthe idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hungerā.
Upon Hamasā takeover in June, Israel sealed all of Gazaās border crossings and reduced the fishing space from 20 to 6 nautical miles, but it wasnāt until September that the Israeli government declared Gaza a besieged āhostile entityā after the Islamic Jihad group fired projectiles on Israel.
It was never about Hamas
The blockadeās stated goal was to collectively punish the population in order to turn them against Hamas and end the groupās rule. Israel even devised a of the bare minimum amount of imports needed to prevent Gazans from dying from hunger.
However, in 2008, it became clear Israel was starving, isolating, and immiserating Gazans with one hand while preventing Hamasā collapse with the other. That year, hundreds of millions of shekels every month to the Hamas government, mostly through currency exchanges for smuggled money.
In 2009, Olmert refrained from to Hamas during Operation Cast Lead because Israel didnāt want to reoccupy Gaza or hand it back to the PA; a strategy in 2019, saying āI won't give [Gaza] to [PA president] Abu Mazenā.
Over the years, Israel developed a solid transactional relationship with Hamas by which the latter polices the blockade and prevents attacks on Israel during times of ceasefire and in return Israel eases some of its restrictions on Gaza.
In 2012, this relationship prompted āIsrael Killed Its Subcontractor in Gazaā in reference to the Qassam Brigades leader whose troops were ensuring calm for Israel.
![A Palestinian girl stands amid the rubble of her destroyed home on 24 May 2021 in Beit Hanoun, Gaza. [Getty]](/sites/default/files/styles/large_16_9/public/2021-06/GettyImages-1233090336.jpg?h=a4507e6b&itok=yguJVpNM) |
All about separation and isolation
In 2009, Hamasā control and Gazaās blockade allowed Israel to make official one of its most controversial policies that violate the Oslo Accords into virtual obsolescence. By military order 1650, Israel declared any Gazan in the West Bank an āillegal alienā and an āinfiltratorā subject to arrest, deportation, or imprisonment for up to seven years.
Since 2010, āSeparation Policyā as a legal justification for restrictions on Gazansā freedom of movement.
In 2019, Israel even started to allow Qatari cash to enter Gaza, which was intended to help needy families and provide aid, fuel, and government salaries.
Israel said it sought to stabilise Gaza, conditioned onĢżmaintaining calm, but theĢżmove had another dimension; to fuel the division and separation between Gaza and West Bank.
As āwhoever is against a Palestinian state should be forā transferring the funds to Gaza to ākeep Palestinians dividedā.
This made clear that Hamas has been more of a pretext to justify ±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās escalating collective punishment and isolation of Gaza rather than the actual reason for these extreme measures.
"Israel's siege has no clear endgame. There is no certain military objective or condition that, if achieved, would lead Israel to lift the blockade"
A permanent state of non-life
±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās transactional relationship with Hamas is limited to preventing Gazaās total collapse, without allowing it to ever live or prosper.
Netanyahuās then put it simply in 2018: āWe allow them to keep their heads above water, but not beyond thatā. His successor āWe will not allow real and long-term development in the Gaza Stripā.
This means an average highly educated Gazan by the age of 35 has almost never been able to find a job, afford to fall in love and start a family, or put food on the table. In other words, Palestinians are stuck in a permanent state of non-life, or as Gazans call it āslow deathā.
Israel deliberately exploits the misery it created in Gaza to push its people to emigrate and leave the territory. In 2019, actively to find countries to absorb Gazan immigrants.
What makes this more troubling is that ±õ²õ°ł²¹±š±ōās siege has no clear endgame. There is no certain military objective or condition that, if achieved, would lead Israel to lift the blockade. It is, rather, an indefinite instrument to maintain the status quo of inequality and oppression in the occupied Palestinian territories.
Muhammad Shehada is a Palestinian writer and analyst from Gaza and the EU Affairs Manager at Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor.
Follow him on Twitter:Ģż
![Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty described the Israeli aggression as a blatant violation of Lebanon's sovereignty. [Getty]](/sites/default/files/styles/image_684x385/public/71545303.jpeg?h=327453ef&itok=1uWOWNWk)
![Religious hymns and odes are recited during the event held in the Nuseirat Refugee Camp in central Gaza, which is under Israeli attacks, to commemorate Mawlid al-Nabi, marking the birth of Prophet Muhammad on September 15, 2024. [Getty]](/sites/default/files/styles/image_684x385/public/2171398138.jpeg?h=a5f2f23a&itok=Uw8zDh5Q)
Ģż
