°®Âţµş

s, Palestinian-Israeli leader of the , a conservative Islamist party,Ěýand a member of Israeli Prime Minister ’s coalition government, is proving himself to be a satisfactory tool in the Israeli government’s arsenal of assaults against the Palestinian people’s historical and collective memory.ĚýĚý

In December, while speaking at the Globes Israel Business Conference, Abbas statements that would have made the earliest Zionist leaders proud. “The State of Israel was born as a Jewish state,” Abbas . “It is the decision of the people and the question is not about the identity of the state. It was born this way and will remain so.”Ěý

In his speech, there was not even the slightest recognition of the Palestinians’ trauma of as a result of Zionist colonisation. On the contrary, placing Palestinians at a subjugated level, Abbas emphasised, “The question is how to integrate Arab society into it,” with reference to the Jewish - and one should add colonial and apartheid - state.Ěý

The Jerusalem Post Abbas “not only courageous, but credible.” A blog written for the Times of Israel that Abbas “was saying to his own community that we need to get past old controversies, recognise the reality of the Jewish state, and move on.”ĚýĚý

“Abbas’s approach therefore could be a liberating moment,” the blog .ĚýĚý

"The "good Arab"Ěý– in this case Mansour Abbas – is willingly disseminating Israel’s colonial narrative at the expense of the indigenous Palestinians"

With such an oblivious approach, no wonder Israel is over Abbas as though he were a new hero. The “good Arab” – in this case Mansour Abbas – is willingly disseminating Israel’s colonial narrative at the expense of the indigenous Palestinians, including those living in Israel. And the settler-colonial enterprise will willingly back Abbas up, while there is need.

In the end, figures such as Abbas serve a twisted purpose. For now, the current colonial agenda, based upon preserving , would benefit from a friendly PalestinianĚýwithin the Knesset’s own ranks.ĚýĚý

At the moment, Bennett is busy settlement construction and to the opening of the US consulate in Jerusalem for Palestinians. “The government under my leadership has repeatedly clarified its position that there is no place for a Palestinian consulate in Jerusalem,” Bennett recently .ĚýĚý

And while Abbas that opening the US consulate would “balance” recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the fact remains that he has not argued politics to the contrary, thus ensuring that the Zionist narrative reigns supreme while acting as its mouthpiece.ĚýĚý

"It will never be forgotten that Archbishop Desmond Tutu was a staunch ally to the Palestinians."

— °®Âţµş (@The_NewArab)

In some ways, and rather unfortunately, Abbas is creating a balance between Israel and the compliant , with the latter seeking out occasions such as the latest statement to portray itself as upholding the Palestinian people’s rights to liberation.ĚýĚý

The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) pointed out that Mansour Abbas’s statements contradict “our right to self-determination, detract from the rights of our people inside the 1948 lands and constitute a direct threat to them, while it reinforces the Zionist policy of racism in dealing with them and with their rights in their homeland."Ěý

But the PLO, through the , also abandoned Palestinians living in Israel, just as it abandoned the Palestinian refugees. The “good Arab” in Israel, therefore, has his equivalent in the corrupt and donor-funded leadership in Ramallah. The only difference is that while the Palestinian Authority can shift between positions as long as it remains tethered to the two-state paradigm, Mansour Abbas is openly spouting the Zionist narrative, assimilating himself to it and attempting to create an agenda where the Jewish colonial state is preferably not contested from a Palestinian perspective.Ěý

Mansour Abbas’s illusion of coexistence should be called out for what it is – an attempt applauded by the Israeli government to impose Israel’s colonial narrative on Palestinians. He should know, however, that the Palestinian people, unlike the leadership in Ramallah, are away from their narrative that is held together by the trauma that created the Palestinian rupture.ĚýĚý

If Palestinians were to adhere to Abbas’s call to accept that Israel’s existence as a Jewish state should not be questioned, it would mean abandoning their own memory of the to completely accommodate the European Jewish settler population. In much the same way that several diplomats at the UN argued in favour of the 1947 Partition Plan, which paved the way for Zionist colonisation in Palestine, accepting Abbas’s purportedly pragmatic tone would legitimise colonial supremacy over Palestinian collective memory, to the point that the latter would become non-existent.ĚýĚý

Why should Israel’s identity not be questioned by the colonised Palestinian population, considering their existence prior to the settler-colonial enterprise? Again, parallels here may be drawn with PA leader Mahmoud Abbas his right of return and admitting an unequivocal acceptance of Israel’s altering of Palestinian land through colonisation.

"As much as he may now bask in Zionist limelight because it serves the government’s interests to have a Palestinian deny his roots to laud assimilation, Mansour Abbas has nothing to celebrate"ĚýĚý

Political divide among Palestinians is a serious issue exacerbated not only because of differing ideologies of factions, but also due to decades of compromise and political pragmatism – the latter generally used to depict the PA’s diplomacy against that of Hamas.ĚýĚý

Within Israel, Palestinians are largely forgotten due to the focus on Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Mansour Abbas’s Zionist stance is an affirmation not only of oblivion, but also of accordance with the Israeli government’s repeated attempts to enforce assimilation, while still depriving Palestinians of their rights.ĚýĚý

As Israel’s narrative remains the dominant one so far, particularly within the international community, which places much more emphasis on Israel’s “right to defend itself” than it does on the Palestinian people’s ongoing Nakba. Abbas’s betrayal, like that of other Palestinians assimilating to the Israeli narrative for personal gain and borrowed influence, is detrimental to the Palestinian people’s collective memory.Ěý

However, with the Israeli government’s backing, Abbas oversteps the limits of personal gain. Stepping into Israel’s right wing from a position of political influence clearly shows that Abbas holds no affinity towards his own history, or that he thinks nothing of political betrayal.ĚýĚý

As much as he may now bask in Zionist limelight because it serves the government’s interests to have a Palestinian deny his roots to laud assimilation, Mansour Abbas has nothing to celebrate. A “good Arab” designated by Israel can only mean a traitor to the legitimate Palestinian struggle for liberation.ĚýĚý

Ramona Wadi is an independent researcher, freelance journalist, book reviewer and blogger specialising in the struggle for memory in Chile and Palestine, colonial violence and the manipulation of international law.

Have questions or comments? Email us at editorial-english@alaraby.co.uk

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of °®Âţµş, its editorial board or staff.