°®Âþµº

Public statements in addition to the letter reveal that the Biden administration has proposed a dialogue to be held in Turkey involving regional actors, various representatives of the Afghan government, and the Taliban to finalise a peace agreement and establish an interim government. 

Read more: 

The letter, leaked by Afghanistan's Tolo News and , also sheds light on the disunity and lack of inclusivity in the Afghan government as a significant barrier to peace, along with Taliban-led violence. Biden's recognition of this reality should make keeping US troops in the country until a political settlement is found a non-starter - even though Blinken acknowledges in the letter that the administration has not yet decided whether to withdraw troops by the May 1 deadline.

Blinken also urges President Ashraf Ghani to join "other representatives" of the Afghan government in Turkey to finalise a peace agreement. This language is significant because it undermines Ghani as the elected and therefore sole representative of the Afghan government. The message to Ghani and his circle is clear: play ball and accept an interim government or get out of the way.

This language is significant because it undermines Ghani as the elected and therefore sole representative of the Afghan government

But Ghani insists that executive power can only be transferred through elections and said as much to the Afghan parliament over the weekend. He also knows that participating in the proposed talks in Turkey will spell the end of his political career. 

Feeling backed into a corner, it is quite possible that Ghani himself is the source of the leak as he tries to create a rally around the flag - or in this case the president. Ghani's critics in the government and Afghan civil society may still believe the integrity of the office if the president demands elections rather than a transition to an interim government. 

An interim government that pushes Ghani out of power may also be viewed by some prominent Afghans as a premature concession to the Taliban since violence remains high. However, the found that priorities differ among the general Afghan population and 65.8 percent of respondents support a peace deal even if it leads to a system under Taliban majority influence while 34.2 percent oppose it. This should not be conflated with support for the Taliban which the majority of Afghans oppose. 

According to the letter, Washington also asked the United Nations to convene foreign ministers and envoys from Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, and India to "discuss a unified approach to supporting peace in Afghanistan." This aspiration ignores the fact that regional actors are not unified in their interests in Afghanistan. It is important for President Biden to remind Afghanistan's neighbours that the country's stability affects their collective future far more than America's. 

But bringing them to the table and leaving the room with a consensus on how to cooperate in Afghanistan are two very different things. The inclusion of India in the process will only which remains the single most important country for influencing the Taliban to reduce violence or accept a settlement.

Other ideas floated by Washington include the convening of a "Bonn 2" conference inclusive of the Taliban. But some analysts have this proposal as better on paper than in practice. 

Afghanistan's security situation is likely to get worse before it gets better

The reality on the ground is that Afghanistan's security situation is likely to get worse before it gets better. An of the relative military capacity of the Taliban versus Afghanistan's security forces (ANDSF) concluded that the latter is unlikely to hold territory long-term without a US presence.

The leaked letter appears to agree with this finding and implores the Ghani administration to accept the urgency of achieving a political settlement. Ghani may have to embrace a settlement at the cost of his own political power or risk losing all US support.

Washington should not disengage from Afghanistan but the leaked letter demonstrates just how many conflicting stakeholders affect conditions on the ground in Afghanistan, and why it is a profound mistake to hinge a US troop withdrawal on a settlement that may never come.

Adam Weinstein is a Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute.

This article was originally published by our friends at .

Follow him on Twitter: 

Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@alaraby.co.uk

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of °®Âþµº, its editorial board or staff.