Over the last few decades, the term āradicalisationā has become so politicised and laden with Islamophobic ideas that it can be hard to unpack what it actually means.
Radicalisation is āthe action or process of causing someone to adopt radical positions on political or social issuesā. To me, this sounds like a process that many of us go through as the adult world opens our eyes to the manifold inequalities in the systems that govern us.
Yet for many, āradicalā simply means any iteration of Islam that isnāt sanitised for the white gaze; to be āradicalā as a Muslim means being dangerous, extreme and even a terrorist.
Last week, the head of UK counter-terror policing said that Israelās indiscriminate war on Palestinians in Gaza had created a āradicalisation momentā, with the potential to push many Muslims towards acts of terror, akin to the effect of the Iraq war on previous generations.
Itās not often that I find myself agreeing with anyone involved in the UKās draconian and racist counter-terror apparatus, which has had a proven disproportionate impact on British Muslims, particularly children. But this time, I found myself agreeing because I feel it too.
I feel it in myself and in the shift in the people around me, the communities I live in and come from. Gaza has changed us. Many of us are angry, disillusioned and bereft.
We are disoriented from weekends spent protesting and evenings spent absorbing heinously graphic content of a genocide occurring in real time, only to have to go to work on a Monday morning to find the people around us talking about something as inane as the weather or last nightās TV shows.
I, for one, have never felt less British than when I see my elected representatives (including the so-called opposition) clamour for the support of the blood-stained illegal occupier that is inflicting this ethnic cleansing on the people of Gaza, which has killed more than 28,000 Palestinians.
But, despite acknowledging that this is a pivotal and significant moment with the potential to disenfranchise British Muslims further than we already are, itās clear that the state has no appetite to use this as an opportunity for introspection.
No, there is no evidence at all that this moment will see the state reflect on how its own policies of enabling the massacres of Arabs and Muslims all over the world push young people to the very behaviours that it so rigorously criminalises.
One thing is clear: this āradicalisation momentā will serve as an excuse to police and securitise Muslims in even more invasive and unjust ways. What else could we possibly expect from a government that thrives on manufacturing the conditions of our disillusionment and then criminalising our righteous anger?
What more could we expect from a state built upon the colonisation of our bodies, lands and beliefs, that has no interest in our liberation or struggles?
What we have seen is a violent uptick in the criminalisation of Muslims, even though the counter-terror machine acknowledges that it is Britainās support for Israel that is causing this rising resentment amongst communities.
In the past four months of Israelās assault, in the UK under terrorism laws. This includes those who have been reprimanded by the police for protest signs, such as the for holding a sign of Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman next to coconuts.
In 2023, there was a 13% increase in referrals to Prevent with top policing figures saying that even eleven and twelve year olds are getting into ātroubling conversations onlineā.
But is this all a sign of an increased risk of terrorism or is it evidence of a heightened atmosphere of Islamophobia in which support for Palestine is itself viewed as a precursor or symptom of terrorist activity?
Even the briefest look at the state of the media over the last few months reveals the answer. Palestinians and their allies invited to speak on news shows face demands that they ācondemn Hamasā, even when they speak about their families being killed.
In schools across the country, the same assumptions are being made. Shortly after 7th October schools received that explicitly called for the protection of Jewish children, with millions pledged to ensure their safety, and the need to treat anti-Semitism seriously.
The same guidance did not even explicitly mention Muslims, Arabs, or Islamophobia, only making vague references alongside teachersā duty to report anything suspicious to Prevent.
Some London schools saw extra police patrols stationed outside and āā taking place on school grounds with teachers mandated to pass any evidence of ācommunity tensionsā onto police.
We have seen peace marches calling for a ceasefire portrayed as āhate marchesā by the former home secretary and celebrities and citizens alike losing their jobs for speaking out in support of the victims of genocide in Gaza.
We are living in a time when calling for an end to violence carried out by a British ally with British complicity makes you a āterroristā but cheering on a genocide does not.
It has never been clearer that the UK has no desire to view counter-terror through the lens of anything but surveillance, criminalisation and discrimination of Muslim communities whilst continuing its bloodlust imperial agenda overseas.
If this truly is a āradicalisation momentā, then it is one the UKās own making. Until the state is able to accept this, then the apparatus Britons rely upon to keep them safe from terrorism is unfit for purpose.
Nadeine Asbali is a secondary school teacher in London.
Follow her on Twitter:
Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@newarab.com
Opinions expressed here are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect those of their employer, or of °®Āžµŗ and its editorial board or staff.