I have visited Cairo once or twice every year for the past five years. On the streets of this buzzing city, Iâve learnt to read, through casual chats and rants, the Egyptian peopleâs general mode, aspirations and, quite often, the ever-growing discontent regarding the countryâs economic and political status.
But this year, in addition to the increased economic discomfort, there is also Gaza to add to the pile of public discontent with the regime.
Almost everywhere you go across Cairo, you get a glimpse of Palestine flags and posters in shop windows, expressions of support for the resistance, and even state-owned TV channels dedicated lots of air time to Gaza.
You may think this is nothing out of the ordinary, given Egypt's historical stance on Palestine. But this is perhaps the first explicit, sometimes aggressive, pro-Palestine posture on state-owned media outlets since President Sisi took office in 2013.
In fact, in recent years, there were several against those exhibiting public solidarity with Palestine.
The current âexpanded scopeâ of explicit support for Palestine, however, does not seem to eliminate the public distrust in the regimeâs direction. The ambivalence and uncertainty about the governmentâs intentions, which have so far characterised its economic policies, seem to have now extended to the issue of Palestine.
Now, as an Israeli offensive is looming toward Rafah on the Egypt-Gaza border, there is growing Egyptian anxiety about Israeli intentions of forcing Palestinians into the Sinai Desert.
âThey [the regime] know weâre simmering with anger over the deteriorating economy, and now because of Gaza. Theyâre allowing explicit expressions of support for Palestine because they want to divert our attention away from the miserable living conditions,â a Cairo Uber driver said to me.
âItâs the typical governmentâs sponge. When things get bad, they throw in this sponge - Gaza this time - to âabsorbâ some of the anger,â he added.
In late October, after over a decade of ban on gatherings, the Egyptian government allowed for a âcontrolled crowdâ to take to the streets after the Friday prayer in the streets adjacent to Tahrir Square to express their support for Gaza.
The general impression was that the regime may have resorted to its âspongeâ to absorb the publicâs anger about Gaza, fearing it would spill over into other areas like the economy and political suppression, then morph into anti-regime demos, as happened in January 2011 against Mubarak.
Not only did some of this âcontrolled crowdâ past the heavy security presence and flood into Tahrir Square, but the âfree Palestineâ slogans became also about the âdaily bread,â somewhat reminiscent of the January revolution.
The dentist I visited - who refused to charge me for treatment in solidarity with Palestine - thinks al-Sisiâs regime ââŠhas swallowed Egypt and wonât hesitate to sell out Palestine to stay in power.â
âThis disgraceful peace treaty with the [Zionist entity] must be binned. What is the point of a powerful army if we cannot stop the genocide?â, she whispered.
âIf only they open the Rafah border and let us fight with our brothers [Palestinians],â is a statement I heard repeatedly by some Egyptians, expressed angrily every time.
Sentimentalism and sincere allegiances, however, do not necessarily set the trajectory for what the regime sees as national interests. Most of the Egyptians I talked to felt the government needed to do a lot more for Gaza, especially as Netanyahu is now threatening to attack Rafah.
But has the Egyptian government truly set any red lines for Israel? Would the forced expulsion of Gazans into Sinai be one of them? More critical yet, what are Egyptâs options if that happens?
Last week, Egyptian officials reportedly warned that Egypt would void the long-standing Camp David peace treaty with Israel if Israeli troops invaded the densely-populated Rafah, where 1.4 million Palestinians have sought shelter from Israelâs indiscriminate bombardment.
Egypt, like the majority of the international community, fears that an Israeli assault on Rafah, would be unimaginably catastrophic.
For Egypt specifically, it is also, if not more, about the fear of a mass influx of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians running for their lives into Egyptâs Sinai, knowing reasonably well, based on historical precedents, that Israel would never allow them to return to their homes.
Since October, Egypt has reinforced its border with Gaza and increased its military presence in the area. All against the backdrop of reports of extensive on Cairo, mainly via economic incentives, to allow Palestinian refugees into Sinai.
If an influx were to happen - effectively a second Nakba - not only would it tarnish Egyptâs image as a historical patron of the Palestine cause and cast doubts on its military and political leverage, but it would also jeopardise the countryâs national security in the volatile Sinai Desert and beyond.
Arguably, a Palestinian pocket in the Sinai will grow to become an extension, with a larger scope of geographical manoeuvrability, for Palestinian resistance to attack the Israeli army, risking a direct confrontation with Israel.
But this is only one side of the story. Others, immersed in an atmosphere of distrust in the regime, feel the latter will not sacrifice its ties with Israel and the United States by extension for Gaza.
Egypt-Israel ties have survived multiple crises, including Israelâs 1982 invasion of Lebanon; the Palestinian Intifadas; the 2002 blockade on Yassir Arafat in Ramallah; four bloody wars on Gaza; and some fatal Israeli-Egyptian border.
Since Sisi took office eleven years ago, Egyptian-Israeli coordination economically and strategically. The Egyptian army destroyed hundreds of tunnels used by Palestinians to smuggle goods and weapons into the blockaded Strip. Cairo has also demolished thousands of homes to create a buffer zone in Sinai between Egypt and Gaza.
Meanwhile, Egyptian army officers and businessmen close to the regime have been capitalising on the suffering of Palestinians in the Strip. The Rafah Crossing between Egypt and Gaza is now officially sealed for ânormal travellingâ, declaredly to prevent a Palestinian influx into Egypt.
But the closure has grown into a business opportunity for people within and close to the regime to charge hefty amounts of cash to facilitate exit from Gaza into Egypt for desperate Palestinians.
Palestinians call them Sisiâs âmerchants of war.â They asked for $10,000 but promised no guarantees. The waiting list is so long now that the 'new applications' were put temporarily on hold.
âEveryone [officials] must have a part of the cake, exactly like they do with us [Egyptians],â my Egyptian friend commented angrily.
This contradictory image makes it difficult to predict how Egypt will react in case of a Rafah invasion.
Will the government prioritise national security over economic considerations and confront Israel militarily, hence tearing down the decades-long peace treaty?
Or, would Cairo continue its soft diplomacy toward Palestine?
Egyptians I talked to swing between the first and second scenarios, but no one seems to have the full, certain answer.
Only time can tell if the grey area of uncertainty will turn black or white.
Dr Emad Moussa is a Palestinian-British researcher and writer specialising in the political psychology of intergroup and conflict dynamics, focusing on MENA with a special interest in Israel/Palestine. He has a background in human rights and journalism, and is currently a frequent contributor to multiple academic and media outlets, in addition to being a consultant for a US-based think tank.
Follow him on Twitter:
Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@newarab.com
Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of °źÂț”ș, its editorial board or staff.