°®Âþµº

Ending hunger is not about handouts or food distribution, which often create a cycle of dependency. While this works in emergency situations, acute hunger due to emergency situations represents a small fraction of those living in hunger.

The vast majority of those living in hunger are suffering from chronic hunger which is often invisible, yet one of the most insidious impacts of extreme poverty. 

This "old way" of doing aid tended to promote top-down strategies and policies, which didn't put the communities themselves in the driver's seat. Despite good intentions, this kind of aid often creates communities of dependency that have a harder time thriving once development organisations "pull out" - if they ever do.

The global community should be asking the question: how can communities become self-reliant so they are no longer dependent on international organisations - and donors - to move forward?

We know that , so what actions can we take to do so sustainably?

One way is for development organisations and other actors to move away from top-down approaches that foster dependency, and instead focus on bottom-up solutions that partner with communities who, with the right tools and training, lead the change.

how can communities become self-reliant so they are no longer dependent on international organisations - and donors - to move forward?

The Hunger Project's is an example of this kind of gender-focused, . The strategy is designed to partner with communities over a period of about eight years, graduating to a phase of "sustainable self-reliance".

This means that communities have demonstrated the confidence, capacity and skills to act as agents of their own development. This community-led approach focuses not on projects but on systemic change, which works to achieve locally owned vision and goals.

And it's working. Three of The Hunger Project's epicenters (around 10-15,000 people in each community) in Eastern Ghana to self-reliance this year. Community members of these epicenters have affirmed multiple local partnerships, created funding streams from revenue-generating activities and established gender-balanced leadership structures to support sustainable growth.

The Hunger Project fosters a culture of self-determination and economic viability in which the community itself is the driver of continued change

In partnership with The Hunger Project, community members were involved in establishing a diverse set of about 50 targets their progress and assess their path to sustainability. This increases buy-in, ownership and accountability - the ultimate owners of the targets are the communities themselves.

By stimulating this type of gender-focused, community-led development, The Hunger Project fosters a culture of self-determination and economic viability in which the community itself is the driver of continued change.

In essence, these communities are taking charge of their own development processes, and can therefore sustain and enhance the work they began in partnership with The Hunger Project. They are the ones taking action to end their own hunger, and they will continue to do so.

Development is a long, hard process. It is complex, requires multi-sector partnerships and takes time. But to do it sustainably - and achieve lasting change - we need to operate with clear exit strategies that pass the reins, fully, to communities themselves.


A version of this article was originally published by .


Åsa Skogström Feldt is CEO of The Hunger Project.

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of °®Âþµº, its editorial board or staff.