°®Âþµº

For weeks, Western intelligence agencies that Moscow might manufactureÌýfalse-flag attacksÌýto justify its invasion of Ukraine.

As if by cue, in the days leadingÌýup to the Russian assault, videos emergedÌýon social media allegedly showing such "killings" and "provocations".

The videos have been proven fakeÌýby monitors, such as Bellingcat, butÌýÌýand disinformation will likely continueÌýto beÌýpowerful weapons in theÌýRussian arsenal during their invasionÌýand occupation of Ukraine.

Similar tactics have already been deployed by Moscow in the , eastern Ukraine, as well as in Kazakhstan, which were brutally crushed with Russia's help.

is one of the monitors that has been tracking down and debunking some of these fake videos.

It has asked people sharing footage of Ukraine to source and credit the material for the interest of accountability.

If you're sharing videos and photographs from Ukraine with accountability in mind, please make an effort to share them with links to the source you're using, it greatly assists organisations who are verifying conflict incidents.

— Bellingcat (@bellingcat)

, an expert on disinformation and digital authoritarianism, has also been documenting war propaganda published by Russian government media outlets RT and Sputnik.

"Sites like Russia Today are attempting to feed stories that strategically assist Russia. For example, emphasising stories about Ukrainian soldiers laying down arms and surrendering is designed to sow fear among soldiers and emphasise the military superiority of Russia - suggesting resistance is futile," he told °®Âþµº.

The researchers working to bring Syria war crimes to light on how and came into being in response to atrocities in Syria.

— Syria Notes (@SyriaNotes)

"They also refrain from any suggestion that Russia is the aggressor, [using] terms like Russian 'special operations' or 'peacekeeping' in Donbas as opposed to invasion. Indeed, the RTÌýTwitter account has been sharing lots of condemnations of the term 'invasion'."

He said that these media outlets areÌýframing Moscow'sÌýinvasion of Ukraine as a response to external aggression, which is being swallowed by some - but by no means all - people in Russia.Ìý

"For example, [Russia] withdrew its diplomatic staff from Ukraine hours before the invasion claiming they were being threatened. In the build-up to the invasion Russian media frequently emphasised Ukrainian aggression as being the reason for an increased Russian presence in Ukraine," he said.

"Of course, it is absurd that someone would provoke Russia in such a situation, and such information is simply designed to legitimise an illegal Russian invasion."

[Thread] This is a short analysis of textbook war propaganda, mostly taken from Russian state-controlled media RT and Sputnik

1) First up, don't mention the war! Well almost, Russian websites don't like the term 'invasion', preferring 'special military operation'

— Marc Owen Jones (@marcowenjones)

He said that this discourse is even more pronounced on Russian state news agency Sputnik.

"Russia isÌýalways 'counter-attacking', as opposed to 'attacking', and they emphasise the accuracy of their weapons and that they do not target civilians. Meanwhile, they emphasise Ukrainian attacks on civilians," he said.

Meanwhile,ÌýRussia reportedlyÌýinstructed its own media to publish only news from official sources, according to Reuters.

Samuel Ramani, associate fellow at Royal United Services Institute (RUSI),Ìýsaid that these restrictions are likely to ensure that Russian media sell the line thatÌýRussian operations are defensive byÌýprotecting ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine and curbing NATO 'expansionism'.

"Outside sources that would show that Ukraine is nowhere near joining NATO and Russia is killing civilians in Ukraine would undermine trust in Kremlin rhetoric," he told °®Âþµº.

"Hence the need for censorship. Putin’s approval ratings soared to 90% after the Crimea annexation and at a time of uncertainty about the economy and Russia's devastating COVID death toll, uniting the people around a Western-Ukrainian combined threat is compelling."Ìý

There have been calls in the UK for the government to follow Germany's move and ban broadcasterÌýRT.

Labour leader Keir Starmer told parliament on TuesdayÌýthat the Russian "campaign of misinformation should be tackled... broadcasting its propaganda around the world" should be stopped in the UK by banning RT.

Some have pointed out that the move might be counterproductive as it would lead the Kremlin to take a similar step against the BBC, which is followed by many more people in Russia than RT is in the UK.