°®Âþµº

"German arrogance" towardsÌýÌýhas been called out by one of Berlin's previous foreign ministers.

Sigmar Gabriel, who tweeted his criticism on Saturday, served as foreign minister for the Social Democratic Party (SPD) from 2017 to 2018 during a coalition headed by then-Chancellor Angela Merkel.

His comments touched on LGBTQ+ and workers' rights, issues has been heavily attacked over in the run-up to its hosting of the 2022 .

"How forgetful are we? Homosexuality was a punishable offence in Germany until 1994," Gabriel said, according to theÌýDoha NewsÌý·É±ð²ú²õ¾±³Ù±ð.

"My mother still needed her husband's permission to work. We treated 'guest workers' crappy and housed them miserably."

Die deutsche Arroganz gegenüber Qatar ist „zum Ko…“! Wie vergesslich sind wir eigentlich? Homosexualität war bis 1994 in D strafbar. Meine Mutter brauchte noch die Erlaubnis des Ehemanns, um zu arbeiten. „Gastarbeiter“ haben wir beschissen behandelt und miserabel untergebracht.

— Sigmar Gabriel (@sigmargabriel)

The former SPD leader added that it "took [Germany] decades to become a liberal country", saying "progress does not come overnight, but step by step".

Gabriel said: "The UN, the ILO [International Labour Organization] praise the country for its reforms. Only we Germans insult it every day."

The football World Cup will begin in Qatar on 20 November, the first to take place in the Arab world.

Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani last week hit out at an "unprecedented campaign" of criticism over the competition.

"Since we won the honour of hosting the World Cup, Qatar has faced an unprecedented campaign that no other host nation has received," he said.

Many football and political analysts have pointed out that Russia allegedly faced less criticism of its hosting of the World Cup in international media despite its invasion of Crimea, the bombing of Syria, and repression of journalists and activists.

Five false claims on Qatar World Cup analysed and debunked

— °®Âþµº (@The_NewArab)

said Qatar had initially accepted negative commentary "in good faith" and "even considered that some criticism was positive and useful, helping us to develop aspects that need to be developed".

He added that much of the criticism now is based on false reports and fabrications.

"But it soon became clear to us that the campaign continues, expands and includes fabrications and double standards, until it reached an amount of ferocity that made many wonder, unfortunately, about the real reasons and motives behind this campaign," he said.

Agencies contributed to this report.